These are the steps of how science is made (for those of you who still don't know)
1. Some scientist applies the scientific method to his/her are of knowledge. He/She writes a hipotesis, tests data, and writes a report with results with results and conclusions. A paper is born.
2. Now that he/she is sure of the paper. He starts communicating to other scientist about the idea. Other people confirm it (or not)
3. The paper is published, or not.
4. Science boards study the paper providing a answer to the matter. Is it good? or is it flawed?
5. When some time has passed, 10 years or 20 years (who knows), scientists have being studying the matter for quite a time. New theories have emerged over this paper. Science, can be said, accept the Theory in the paper as true.
6. After a theory is found out to be "true". There are legal and cultural implications. All people on the world "must" believe what the scientific theory says.
I am sure there other in-step steps I am missing. But this is pretty much the way the system in science goes.
So, what's the catch?. The problem is that this is an special technocracy alienated to be like democracy. And we now that in democracy "consensus" can be, and almost always is, fabricated by the massive media. Here is a bunch of people, deciding what the rest of the world should be thinking. We, the normal people, don't have a clue on that, and should accept as faith what they had said. ¿Sounds awful isn't it?. So here is the list again but seen how the complex reality really is.
1. This scientist, influented by the normal paradigms of his class, the years listening to the same theories several times a day proposes a new experiment with the interpretation guided by thouse theories.
2. His other fellow scientist have the same paradigms, beliefs systems. They will agree based on his common paradigms.
3. The magazine editor publishes the work, only if it is going to be good for the scientific magazine. Scientific public, "The buyers", must like the content of the magazine. If it is based on bad evidence it can be bad for sales. Finally the paper is only published when there's a high chance that it will be a lasting paper.
4. Science boards. Same as point 2, but with higher reputation involved. Reputation means be accord the paradigms.
5. 10, 20 years later. The theories repeated multiple times, they get the status of true in this society.
6. The rest of the world accepts the theory and make cultural and legal changes. We can't argue to it because we're not "ENTITLED" to have an disent opinion. But don't worry the massive media will do its job to make you believe what you should believe.
"...Pues habiendo conocido a Dios, no le glorificaron como a Dios, ni le dieron gracias, sino que se envanecieron en sus razonamientos, y su necio corazón fue entenebrecido. Profesando ser sabios, se hicieron necios, y cambiaron la gloria del Dios incorruptible en semejanza de imagen de hombre corruptible ..." Romanos 1:21-23
"...because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man ..." Romans 1:21-23
No comments:
Post a Comment